John Walsh v. James Hartley

John Walsh v. James Hartley

Petitioner:	John Walsh
Respondent:	James Hartley
Case Number:	2:2011cv03018
Filed:	April 11, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge:	Josephine Staton Tucker
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 2, 2011	Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 6 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the R eport and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (mp)
April 20, 2011	Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before May 23, 2011, Petitioner shall show cause, if there be any, why this Court should not recommend dismissal with prejudice of the Petition based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations or dismissal without prejudice based on failure to exhaust state remedies. Petitioner is also advised that if he fails to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause, the Magistrate Judge will recommend that the District Court dismiss the Petition, with prejudice, based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 2, 2011

Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 6 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the R eport and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (mp)

April 20, 2011

Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, on or before May 23, 2011, Petitioner shall show cause, if there be any, why this Court should not recommend dismissal with prejudice of the Petition based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations or dismissal without prejudice based on failure to exhaust state remedies. Petitioner is also advised that if he fails to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause, the Magistrate Judge will recommend that the District Court dismiss the Petition, with prejudice, based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Walsh v. James Hartley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: John Walsh
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: James Hartley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?