Guillermo Lopez v. Professional Collection Consultants

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Guillermo Lopez v. Professional Collection Consultants

Guillermo Lopez v. Professional Collection Consultants

Plaintiff:	Guillermo Lopez
Defendant:	Professional Collection Consultants
Case Number:	2:2011cv03214
Filed:	April 15, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 9, 2012	Filing 40 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING Defendant's motions to dismiss by Judge Philip S. Gutierrezdenying 33 , 34 , 35 Motions to Dismiss: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants motions to dismiss are DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm)
October 19, 2011	Filing 22 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING Defendant's motion to dismiss 15 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Pending before the Court is Defendant Professional Collection Consultants' ("Defendant") motion to dismiss Plaintiff Guillermo Lopez's ("Plaintiff") complaint. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the moving and opposing papers, the Court GRANTS the motion... Defendant& #039;s motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED for failure to state a claim under the FDCPA or the Rosenthal Act. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend and file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has until November 2, 2011 to file a second amended complaint. Failure to do so will result in the case being dismissed with prejudice. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) (lw)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 9, 2012

Filing 40 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING Defendant's motions to dismiss by Judge Philip S. Gutierrezdenying 33 , 34 , 35 Motions to Dismiss: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants motions to dismiss are DENIED. (see document for further details) (bm)

October 19, 2011

Filing 22 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING Defendant's motion to dismiss 15 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Pending before the Court is Defendant Professional Collection Consultants' ("Defendant") motion to dismiss Plaintiff Guillermo Lopez's ("Plaintiff") complaint. The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. After considering the moving and opposing papers, the Court GRANTS the motion... Defendant& #039;s motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED for failure to state a claim under the FDCPA or the Rosenthal Act. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend and file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has until November 2, 2011 to file a second amended complaint. Failure to do so will result in the case being dismissed with prejudice. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) (lw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guillermo Lopez v. Professional Collection Consultants
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Collection Consultants
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Guillermo Lopez
Represented By:	Mahadhi Corzano
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?