Reggie D Cole v. City of Los Angeles et al
Reggie D Cole |
City of Los Angeles, Does, Pete Razanskas and Marcella Winn |
2:2011cv03241 |
April 15, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Margaret M. Morrow |
Andrew J. Wistrich |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 342 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 341 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, P. RAZANSKAS AND M. WINN are hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(ii). Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb) |
Filing 331 STIPULATED JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties Stipulation to Enter Judgment, 329 is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff REGGIE COLE, and against THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, only, in the sum of $5,200,000 ($5.2 million dollars) (including attorneys fees and costs). (shb) |
Filing 206 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall,GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Case 205 Pursuant to Settlement Agreement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb) |
Filing 63 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re Stipulation for Protective Order 61 . See document for details. (yb) |
Filing 36 PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR DISTRICT ATTORNEY FILES by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 35 . (mz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.