University Park, LLC et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
University Park, LLC and James R Watson |
Zurich American Insurance Company, American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company and Steadfast Insurance Company |
2:2011cv03328 |
April 19, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 JUDGMENT of Dismissal by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, in favor of Defendants American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company and against Plaintiffs University Park, LLC, James R Watson. I S HEREBY ORDERED, THAT Plaintiffs take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits and that a judgment of dismissal with prejudice of the entire action on the Complaint brought by Plaintiffs in the above-entitled action is entered in favor of Defendants as to all causes of action stated against them. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendants, as the prevailing parties, shall recover from Plaintiffs their costs incurred in this action according to proof. Related to: MOTION for Summary Judgment 36 . (lom) |
Filing 36 ORDER GRANTING Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 20 and DENYING Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 22 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.