Brian Reifer v. Evans Law Associates, P.C.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Brian Reifer v. Evans Law Associates, P.C.

Brian Reifer v. Evans Law Associates, P.C.

Plaintiff:	Brian Reifer
Defendant:	Evans Law Associates, P.C.
Case Number:	2:2011cv03501
Filed:	April 25, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Victor B. Kenton
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2011	Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing no later than October 14, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the followi ng, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: PLAINTIFFS FILING OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of th is matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Courts Order may result in the dismissal of the action. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/14/2011. (lmh)
August 25, 2011	Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause in writing no later than September 8, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the foll owing, as an appropriate response to this Order Show Cause, on or before the above date: PROOF OF SERVICE. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Courts order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lmh)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2011

Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing no later than October 14, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the followi ng, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: PLAINTIFFS FILING OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of th is matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Courts Order may result in the dismissal of the action. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/14/2011. (lmh)

August 25, 2011

Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause in writing no later than September 8, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the foll owing, as an appropriate response to this Order Show Cause, on or before the above date: PROOF OF SERVICE. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Courts order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brian Reifer v. Evans Law Associates, P.C.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Evans Law Associates, P.C.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Reifer
Represented By:	Mahadhi Corzano
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?