Jerry Jackson v. Little Caesar Pizza et al
| Jerry Jackson |
| Poura Soroudi, Urban Renaissance LLC, Little Caesar Pizza No. 001-5921, Little Caesar Enterprises Inc., Little Caesar Pizza and Does |
| 2:2011cv03643 |
| April 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gary A. Feess |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS To Show Cause Re: Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Gary A. Feess. For the reasons contained in this order, it appears that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Removing Defendants are therefore her eby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Removing Defendants shall file a written response to this order, not to exceed 5 pages, by no later than 7/5//2011. A failure to file a timely res ponse will be deemed consent to an order remanding this case to state court. To aid Removing Defendants in determining whether this Court has jurisdiction over this case, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to clarify the basis of its claims. Plaintiff must file a written response, not to exceed 3 pages, explaining whether each claim is based on the alleged ADA violations, alleged Building Code violations, both, and/or other violations. Plaintiff must file this response by no later than 6/28/2011. (csi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
