Cengage Learning, inc. et al vs Roland E. Lau, et al
Cengage Learning, inc., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Pearson Education, Inc. and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. |
Does |
2:2011cv03738 |
April 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Copyright |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 123 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that default judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs Cengage Learning, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and Pearson Education, Inc. (" Plaintiffs") against Defendant AIM Discovery Inc. ("AIM") in the total amount of $16,019,737.68 consisting of (1) $15,179,737.68 in trebled actual damages for trademark infringement and (2) $840,000 in statutory damages for copyright infringement. Furthermore, AIM is hereby (1) enjoined from further infringing upon Plaintiffs'respective current and future copyrights. (lom) |
Filing 92 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge John F. Walter re Stipulation for Protective Order, 90 . (ca) |
Filing 60 STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 59 by Judge George H. King: Judgment shall be entered in Plaintiffs favor against Defendants RolandLau and Kentwood Industries, Inc. Defendants Roland Lau and Kentwood Industries, Inc. are liable to Plai ntiffs in the amount of one million four hundred thousand dollars ($1,400,000). Defendants Roland Lau and Kentwood Industries, Inc. are ordered to provide and shall provide upon the request of Publishers, their legal counsel or their designated representative any other authorizations, assignments, consents, waivers, statements, or documents that may be necessary or useful in order to accomplish the payment of the "eBay Funds" to Publishers. Lau and Kentwood shall immediately and p ermanently cease and desist from infringing Plaintiffs' copyrighted works or trademarks. Each side is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Nothing in this Order or the Settlement Agreement prevents Plaintiffs from continuing the instant litigation presently proceeding in this Court against Defendants Qian, AIM Discovery, or Does 1-10. (See document for further specific details). (ir) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.