Ovidio Monterroso v. United States of America
Petitioner: Ovidio Monterroso
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2011cv04176
Filed: May 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS ADJUDGED that the motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. Section 2255 1 is denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ovidio Monterroso v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Cameron L Schroeder
Represented By: Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR
Represented By: Dorothy Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ovidio Monterroso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?