Terrance D Rutherford v. FIA Card Services, N.A. et al
| Terrance D Rutherford |
| Alaska Airlines, Inc., FIA Card Services, N.A. and Horizon Air Industries, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv04433 |
| May 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| J. Spencer Letts |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
JUDGMENT :The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants FIA Card Services, N.A., Alaska Airlines, Inc., and Horizon Air Industries, Inc. and against Plaintiff Terrance D. Rutherford. Plaintiff take nothing from this action and that the action be dismissed with prejudice. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson Related to: MOTION for Judgment 77 (lc)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 47 , 50 , 73 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) . (lc) Modified on 11/16/2012 .(lc). Modified on 11/16/2012 (lc).
|
|
Filing
57
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER COVERING AFFINITY CARD AGREEMENT 55 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
|
|
Filing
45
PROTECTIVE ORDER COVERING AFFINITY CARD AGREEMENT 44 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson GRANTING Defendant Alaska Airlines Inc's Motion to Dismiss 21 , 23 , 35 . Any amended pleading shall be filed with fourteen days of the date of this order. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
