Deirdra Duncan v. SRT Partners LLC et al
| Deirdra Duncan |
| Pasadena Sheriffs Department Civil Division, SRT Partners LLC, Karl P Schlecht, Brian Stone, Neil Thompson, Does, Richard Fell, Eli A Gordon, Scott Kato and Pasadena City Police Department |
| 2:2011cv05132 |
| June 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Valerie Baker Fairbank |
| Oswald Parada |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
RULE 58 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Pursuant to the Court's Opinion and Order 143 issued this same date, this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY IMPROPERLY SERVED DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m) by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/17/2014. (rh)
|
|
Filing
100
JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Judgment of Dismissal With Prejudice be entered against Plaintiff Deirdra Duncan and in favor of Defendants SRT Partners, LLC, Richard Fell, Scott Kato, Brian Stone, and Neal Thompson, and Kimball, Tirey & St. John LLP, Eli A. Gordon and Karl P. Schlecht. Related to: Notice of Lodging 99 , Order on Motion to Dismiss Case 97 (SEE JUDGMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
