XYZ Distributors Inc et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Behnam Partiyeli, Farzard Partiyeli and XYZ Distributors Inc |
| Deputy Sheriff Jeffery Jackson, Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, County of Los Angeles, Does, Sergeant Jim Anderson and City of Vernon |
| 2:2011cv05301 |
| June 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Plaintiff XYZ Distributors, Inc., in accordance with the jurys verdict, is entitled to recover the sum of $547,728.00. Plaintiff XYZ Distributors, Inc., as the prevailing party in this 42 U.S.C. § ; 1983 action, is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. Based on the stipulation of the parties, Plaintiff XYZ Distributors, Inc., is awarded the sum of $850,000 in attorneys' fees and $26,596.78 in costs and l itigation expenses. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff XYZ Distributors, Inc., for the total amount of $1,424,324.78, plus statutory interest from the date of entry of this judgment, and against defendantsDeputy Jeffrey Jackson and Sergeant Jim Anderson. (ir)
|
|
Filing
82
PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS'CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order 79 (see attached) (jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
