His and Her Corp v. Shake-N-Go Fashion Inc
| His and Her Corp |
| Shake-N-Go Fashion Inc, ModelModel Hair Fashion Inc and Does |
| Shake-N-Go Fashion Inc and ModelModel Hair Fashion Inc |
| His and Her Corp |
| 2:2011cv05323 |
| June 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gary A. Feess |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton. In re: Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order 147 . IT IS SO ORDERED this protective order be issued and will remain in effect unless the Court orders otherwise or issues a protective order to replace it in ruling on the pending Protective Order Motion 140 currently scheduled to be heard December 16, 2014. See document for further details. (mkr)
|
|
Filing
128
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: Order re: Status Conference. The Court previously scheduled a status conference in this case for July 28, 2014. However, the parties asked for a continuance of the conference to August 11, 2014. In th eir stipulated request, the parties stated: [T]he parties participated on July 22-23, 2014 in a mediation with the Hon. Sarokin and they are now working on a settlement agreement and currently anticipate concluding a settlement with hte next two week s. (Docket No. 126.) The parties now advise that they have not settled the case, and that the status conference should go forward. To avoid wasting any more time in this case, the Court will treat Mondays event as a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Rule 26(f), Fed. R. Civ. P. The parties are to meet and confer on a proposed schedule leading to trial and to file with the Court the proposed schedule no later than the close of business on August 8, 2014. (smo)
|
|
Filing
110
JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess. IT IS HEREBY: ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety and judgment shall be entered forthwith in favor of Defendants a gainst Plaintiff as to all counts in Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Federal Trademark Registration No. 3,020,614 be cancelled due to genericness; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' counterclaim against Plaintiff based on an allegation of fraud on the Trademark Office is dismissed without prejudice. (bp)
|
|
Filing
102
DENIED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton re Stipulation for Protective Order 100 . Parties may resubmit with definitions of Confidential and Confidential Attorneys Eyes Only. (rh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
