Internet Brands Inc et al v. UltimateCoupons.com LLC et al
| Internet Brands Inc |
| Jeffrey A Grossman, Andrew E Kardon, UltimateCoupons.com LLC and Does |
| 2:2011cv05358 |
| June 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of JAG Ventures, Kardon, and Grossman as to all claims by Internet Brands. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of JAG Ventures, Grossma n and Kardon on the counterclaim for an accounting against Internet Brands. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of JAG Ventures and Kardon on the counterclaim for breach of contract against Internet Brands. (4) Internet Brands shall pay JAG Ventures and Kardon the sum of $1,528,596.96 as damages for breach of contract. (5) Internet Brands shall pay JAG Ventures and Kardon the sum of $305,719.39 in prejudgment interest. Postjudgment interest shall accrue in the amount of $5.98 per day until paid in full. (6) Pursuant to Section 1.4(b) of the Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, JAG Ventures and Kardon are entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys' and auditors' fees incurred in connection with their counterclaim agai nst Internet Brands for breach of contract. JAG Ventures and Kardon shall file a motion to recover such fees within 14 days after entry of this Judgment. (7) As the prevailing parties, JAG Ventures, Grossman, and Kardon are entitled to recover their costs of suit incurred in this action. (8) The Judgment shall be amended to reflect the amount of any fees and costs so awarded. (gk)
|
|
Filing
140
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff's Motion for a Directed Verdict 135 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. A judgment shall issue forthwith. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
|
Filing
112
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Continue the Trial 102 is hereby DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
96
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: INTERPRETATION OF NON-COMPETE AND EARN OUT PAYMENT COVENANTS by Judge Christina A. Snyder: At the 5/20/2013, pretrial conference, the Court requested briefing from both parties as to whether defendants and counterclaim ants' alleged breach of the "non-compete" provision in the parties' agreement excused defendants' breach of the obligation to pay the Year Three earn out payment. After considering the briefs both parties submitted to the Cou rt addressing this issue 92 , 93 , the Court concludes as follows. Upon further consideration, as with the question of materiality, the Court cannot determine as a matter of law whether the parties intended for their respective covenants at issue in this litigation to be independent or dependent. Because the Court cannot determine whether the respective promises are dependent or independent, this issue must also be resolved at trial. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
40
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. Any confidential information or documents produced by or on behalf of any party or non-party as part of discovery in this action may be designated by the producing party(ies) as "CONFIDENTIAL " or "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY." Any information that is publicly available should not be designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY." A document should be designated "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY". [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] 38 (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
