Ronnie O Brown v. Rod Hoops et al
| Ronnie O Brown |
| James Williams, S Zeiger, Mesa, M Utley, Jeffrey Haga, Rod Hoops, Lastra, Omar Lastra, Mc Christian, McChristian, Julius McChristian, B Zeigler and D M Boldt |
| 2:2011cv05415 |
| June 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
296
ORDER RE: TERMINATING SANCTIONS by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Ninth Circuit has held that, [t]he most critical factor to be considered in case-dispositive sanctions is whether a partys discovery violations make it impossible for a court to be con fident that the parties will ever have access to the true facts, and that [w]here a party so damages the integrity of the discovery process that there can never be assurance of proceeding on the true facts, a case dispositive sanction may be appropri ate. See Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 482 F.3d at 1097(citations omitted). Here, plaintiffs conduct over the past year has so damage[d] the integrity of the discovery process that the Court has no confidence that the defendants ever will receive the dis covery ordered, or will be able to proceed to a fair trial even if they do. See Valley Engineers, 158 F.3d at 1058. Because the Court finds actual prejudice to the defendants based on plaintiffs conduct and that lesser sanctions are not available, the Court finds that plaintiffs case should be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) with prejudice. 191 (am)
|
|
Filing
275
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow Re Stipulation for Protective Order 268 . (ad)
|
|
Filing
241
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE DECLARED A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. As such, within 20 days of this order, plaintiff is ordered to explain why he should not be declared a vexatious litigant, barring him from filing pro se complaints without prior court consent and the posting of a bond, subjecting him to a pre-filing order in this action.(See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
189
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Plaintiff's Motion to District Presiding Judge to Review Allegation of Prejudice by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow for Disqualification for Cause 150 ; Plaintiff's Motion for Court to Rule Upon Plaintiff Motion of Recusal of Magistrate Judge; Request to Refer Recusal to the District Court Chief Magistrate Judge for Ruling on Recusal of Magistrate Judge 187 . Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify is hereby DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge David T Bristow: (see document image for further details). Accordingly, on or before 2/17/2012, plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause as to why the order granting him in forma pauperis status in this matter should not be vacated pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g), and that the action dismissed without prejudice pending payment of the full filing fee of $350. (ad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
