Catherine Altamura et al v. Loreal USA Inc et al
Plaintiff: Lisa Pearly and Catherine Altamura
Defendant: Loreal USA Inc and Loreal USA Products Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv05465
Filed: June 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 121 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to File a Renewed Motion for Certification of the California Class 118 is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have up to and including, 1/6/2014, within which to file their renewed motion for class certification. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 115 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings 110 . This stay shall not include Plaintiffs' renewed motion for certification of the California class and any discovery directly related to such renewed motion for class certification. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 108 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 91 is GRANTED in part and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in part. Plaintiffs may make a renewed motion to certify the California class upon submission of expert testimony supporting their proposed method of awarding relief on a classwide basis. See document for details. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
June 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 101 MINUTES by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Exceed Page Limitation in Opposition to Motion for Class Certification 92 , and GRANTS plaintiffs leave to file a reply brief exceeding the applicable page limit by five pages. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
February 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE Defendants' Motion to Strike Class Allegations 75 and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Case 74 . Defendants raise two grounds for striking the class allegations. First, defe ndants argue that the new lead plaintiffs were "recruited" for this litigation by plaintiffs' counsel. Lawyers may solicit clients for litigation, so this argument fails. Second, defendants suggest that the class action allegations sho uld be stricken because the lead plaintiffs are not the "driving force" of this litigation, and instead that plaintiffs' counsel has manipulated the plaintiffs into being a part of this lawsuit. The Court rejects this argument because, among other reasons, defendants have not submitted any evidence calling into question the good faith of plaintiffs or their counsel. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court dismisses plaintiffs' secon d claim for relief in its entirety WITH PREJUDICE, and the Court also dismisses WITH PREJUDICE plaintiffs' third through seventh claims to the extent they assert claims for fraudulent or deceptive conduct based on affirmative false misrepresentations. Otherwise, defendants' motion to dismiss is denied. Court Reporter: Pam Cotten. (gk)
June 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration 43 is GRANTED as to both California class representative Catherine Altamura and New York class representative Lisa Pearly's inability to represent their respective classes. Plaintiffs shall have 90 days from the date of this order to designate a new class representative for both the California class and the New York class. The case is hereby STAYED for 90 days unless plaintiffs 9; counsel notifies the Court and defense counsel that the stay should be lifted based upon the addition of a new representative plaintiff. If plaintiffs' counsel has not submitted new plaintiffs for the California and New York classes at the conclusion of 90 days, the parties are directed to submit a joint status report. These cases shall be removed from the civil active list for the duration of the stay. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Anne Kielwasser. (gk)
May 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiffs' motion for class certification [filed 2/1/2012 in Case No. CV 11-01067 CAS (JCx)] is GRANTED. See document for details re the California Class and New York Class, and exclusions thereto. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Catherine Altamura et al v. Loreal USA Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Pearly
Represented By: Avi Melech Kreitenberg
Represented By: Grace E Parasmo
Represented By: Jeremy R Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherine Altamura
Represented By: Jeremy R Wilson
Represented By: Grace E Parasmo
Represented By: Avi Melech Kreitenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Loreal USA Inc
Represented By: Nicholas James Begakis
Represented By: Dennis S Ellis
Represented By: Katherine Frenck Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Loreal USA Products Inc
Represented By: Nicholas James Begakis
Represented By: Dennis S Ellis
Represented By: Katherine Frenck Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?