Suzanne Jaffe Stillman v. Novartis Consumer Health Inc et al
| Suzanne Jaffe Stillman |
| Renew Life Formulas Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Walgreen Company, Procter and Gamble Company, Heather and Company for IBS LLC, Novartis Consumer Health Inc, Bayer Healthcare LLC and CVS Pharmacy Inc |
| 2:2011cv05603 |
| July 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R. Gary Klausner |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
185
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. On February 6, 2012, the Court granted Motions to Dismiss filed separately by Bayer Healthcare LLC and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. to dismiss the claims of indirect infringementbrought by Plaintiff Suzanne Sti llman in her Second Amended Complaint (SAC).The allegations of indirect infringement, both induced and contributory, in the SAC are substantially similar as to all of the parties. Plaintiff merely changes the name of the Defendants accused product in each paragraph of the allegations. Therefore, the parties are hereby ordered to show cause in a writing not to exceed ten pages filed by noon on Wednesday, April 11, 2012, as to why the analysis of the Courts February 6, 2012 Order (DE 165) should not be applied to the remaining Defendants. Failure to reply may result in dismissal of the claims of indirect infringement as to theremaining Defendants. (sw)
|
|
Filing
166
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, depositions, pleadings, exhibits and all other material or information subject to discovery in this Action, including responses to requests for pr oduction of documents, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, deposition testimony, expert testimony and reports, and all other discovery taken pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules, hereafter furnished, directly or indirectly, by or on behalf of any party, nonparty or witness in connection with this Action (Discovery Material). re Stipulation for Protective Order 130 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
