Hatteras Enterprises Inc v. Art Brands LLC et al
| Hatteras Enterprises Inc |
| Does, Roes and Art Brands LLC |
| 2:2011cv05604 |
| July 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order DENYING Ex Parte Application for Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and for Sanctions by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Having considered the papers submitted in support of and opposition to the motion, the Court DENIES the motion 115 (bp) .
|
|
Filing
110
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and for Sanctions by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez denying 59 Motion to Enforce: For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to enforce Defendant's the parties' settlement agreement without prejudice. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER GOVERNING USE AND DISSEMINATION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 39 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The following Protective Order ("ORDER") shall govern the handling of confidential, proprietary, and trade secret information produced in discovery and/or filed with the Court in this action. (See Order for details) (bem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
