Aqua Connect v. Code Rebel LLC et al
| Aqua Connect |
| Does, Arben Kryeziu, Vladimir Bickov and Code Rebel LLC |
| 2:2011cv05764 |
| July 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
241
JUDGMENT (Confirmation of Arbitration Award) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 240 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jre) Modified on 8/20/2014 to reflect correct filing date (jre).
|
|
Filing
218
ORDER Re: Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Improper Character Evidence 191 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants Motion in Limine. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)
|
|
Filing
180
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 102 signed by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. (jre)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT CODE REBEL, LLC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILECOUNTERCLAIMS 86 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court DENIES CodeRebels Motion for Leave to File Counterclaims. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. (jre)
|
|
Filing
49
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 42 . (mz)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Denying Defendants Code Rebel LLC and Arben Kryeziu's ("Movants") Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 11(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 32 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court also DENIES Plaintiff's own request for sanctions that Plaintiff made in its Opposition to this Motion. (lom)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER re Defendants Arben Kryeziu and Code Rebel, LLC's (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Movants") Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim 25 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court GRANTS Movant s' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES Plaintiff's Misappropriation of Trade Secret Claim, which is Plaintiff's Third Claim in its FAC, without leave to amend. The Court dismisses without leave to amend because the Court finds that no additional facts can be alleged to support a legally cognizable misappropriation of trade secret claim. (lom)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, DENYING Plaintiff Aqua Connect, Inc.'s Motion to Remand 11 . This Court finds that Defendants Code Rebel and Kryeziu's removal was timely under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). Furthermore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff and Defendants Code Rebel and Kryeziu's requests for attorney's fees. (See attached document for details.) (lom)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: granting in part and denying in part 5 Defendants Kreyziu and Code Rebel's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, for Failure to State a Claim [FRCP 12(b)(6)], or in the alternative, for a More Definite Sta tement [FRCP 12(e)] 5 . The Court DENIES Movants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action for False Promise. The Court GRANTS Movants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's: 1. Third Cause of Action for Inducing Breach of C ontract (also known as interfering with the performance of a contract); 2. Fourth Cause of Action for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets; 3. Seventh Cause of Action for Fraudulent Transfer; with 20 days leave to amend. Finally, the Court DENIES Movants' Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e). (See attached document for details.) (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
