David Weisman v. Sanrio Far East Company et al
| David Weisman |
| Michael Post, Sanrio Far East Company, Does, Hysteric Glamour and Hysteric Glamour USA |
| 2:2011cv06033 |
| July 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| George H Wu |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. The Court issues the following Declarations/Judgment: 1. Plaintiff's rights stemming from his December 1970 contract with Sedgwick are limited to Sedgwick's services provided in connection with her wor k on CIAO! MANHATTAN during the period of time specified by the contract. 2. Plaintiff registered CIAO! MANHATTAN with the U.S. Copyright Office in October of 1983 and, therefore, has the additional rights to the images of Sedgwick that arise from that copyright registration. 3. Except as provided in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, Plaintiff has not established a basis for ownership interests in images of Sedgwick under California Civil Code § 3344.1. 4. Judgment is granted in favor of Plaintiff and against Post as to Post's counterclaim to the extent that it is based on any common law/commercial misappropriation rights (or any rights under California Civil Code § 3344) because such rights do not survive death and are n ot descendible. 5. Except as provided above, the Court denies all other requested relief, and dismisses the remaining claims without prejudice. 6. The Court does not find that either side is the "prevailing party" on the §3344.1 claims/issues and, thus, each side is to bear his own costs and attorney's fees. 115 , 116 , 161 . (See attached document for details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 47 . Having reviewed and considered the proposed Stipulated Protective Order, having received no objections thereto, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court adopts the Stipulated Protective Order and HEREBY ORDERS that the Stipulated Protective Order shall apply to these proceedings. (hr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
