Alla Kazovsky v. Metrocities Mortgage LLC et al
| Alla Kazovsky |
| Quality Loan Services Corp, U S Bancorp, Metrocities Mortgage LLC, PennyMac Loan Services LLC, Does and CitiMortgage Inc |
| 2:2011cv06079 |
| July 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Otis D Wright |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER Denying Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record 82 by Judge Otis D Wright II. For the reasons discussed above, the Court DENIES Prospers Motion. Prosper may renew its Motion once Plaintiff has obtained substitute counsel, or upon a proper showing that all of the issues discussed herein have been thoroughly addressed to the Courts satisfaction. (See Order for Details). (sch)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Otis D Wright, II, in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, PennyMac Loan Services LLC against Alla Kazovsky on the second amended complaint. Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, PennyMac Loan Services LLC are dismissed with prejudie and are entitle to costs incurred in an amount to be determined by the Court. Related to: Order 74 (lc)
|
|
Filing
76
AMENDED ORDER FOR JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE INC. by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Judgment is entered in favor of CitiMortgage and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint; CitiMortgage is hereby dismissed from this action. CitiMortgage is entitled to costs incurred in an amount to be determined by the Court. (lc)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER Granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 40 , 42 by Judge Otis D Wright II. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. Specifically, Plaintiffs seventh claim for accounting is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintif fs remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to amend her First Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff fails to do so, all claims will bedismissed with prejudice. (See Order for Details). (sch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
