J R Simplot Company v. City Sea Foods Inc et al
| J R Simplot Company |
| Donald Kanner, City Sea Foods Inc and Joseph Heidelmaier |
| 2:2011cv06211 |
| July 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
MINUTE Of Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson: Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordin gly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 12/22/2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants City Sea Food, Inc. ("City Sea Food") and Joseph Heidelma ier individually and in his corporate capacity ("Heidelmaier"). Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint as to defendants City Sea Food and Heidelmaier. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
