Moroccanoil Inc v. Mirage Hair Fibers et al
Moroccanoil Inc |
Mirage Hair Fibers, Salon Professional Services Inc and Does |
2:2011cv06316 |
August 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M. Gee |
Michael R. Wilner |
Trademark |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 21 , the Court considers this case to be a proper one for a dismissal by court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action against Defendant Salon Professional Services, Inc. is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall bear their own costs and expenses incurred herein and that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. (gk) |
Filing 20 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) AMENDED ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee 19 . In light of the amended notice of settlement, filed May 8, 2012, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status . By June 7, 2012 the parties shall file either (1) a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment or (2) motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of June 8, 2012. The scheduling conference currently set for May 11, 2012 is hereby VACATED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (im) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.