Linden Investment Trust v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al
Linden Investment Trust |
Does, LSI, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, NDex West LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., America's Servicing Company and Brooks American Mortgage Corporation |
2:2011cv06582 |
August 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E. McDermott |
Otis D Wright |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 15 18 : The Court therefore GRANTS U.S. Banks motion. The Notice of Pendency of Action Plaintiff Linden Investment Trust recorded in the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office on February 2, 2011, as Instrument Number 20110184392, and pertaining to the parcel of real property commonly known as 13809 Carpintero Avenue, Bellflower, California 90706, A.P.N. 6280-028-011, and more specifically described as Lot 204 of Tract 14826, in the City of Bellflower, County of Los Angeles, State of California as per Map recorded in Book 372, Pages 30-34, inclusive of Maps of the Record in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, is hereby EXPUNGED IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (ir) Modified on 8/10/2012 (ir). |
Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: GRANTS U.S. Bank's motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 15 and hereby ORDERS the lis pendens expunged. (ir) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.