Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust v. Darracq Concrete
Petitioner: Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust
Respondent: Darracq Concrete
Case Number: 2:2011cv06611
Filed: August 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Suzanne H. Segal
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD: Award issued by Arbitrator Edna Francis on May 12, 2011, is hereby confirmed and enforced, and Respondent Darracq Concrete shall comply with the Award, including the following remedy: To remedy the violation, [D arracq Concrete] shall reinstate Grievant [Cynthia Norwood] to employment and shall award her pay and benefits she would have earned but for the unlawful termination of employment. At a minimum, the award shall cover the period from the date of termi nation of employment to the date of [DarracqConcrete]s receipt of this award. In calculating the amount of backpay to be awarded, [Darracq Concrete] may deduct from the amount of back pay otherwise due (a) the amount of Grievants earnings, if any, fr om interim employment and (b) the amount of any overpayment not recovered by [Darracq Concrete]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to California Civil Code Section 3289(b), Respondent Darracq Concrete must pay an interest at a rate of ten (10) percent per annum from the time of the breach untilfull satisfaction of the arbitration award. This Court retains jurisdiction for purposes of confirming and enforcing any further award made by the arbitrator.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS has a judgment against DARRACQ CONCRETE, as follows: 1. Lost pay for the 462 hours of lost time $8,630.16 between February 15, 2011 to May 13, 2011at the rate of $18.68 per hour 2. Interest of ten (10) percent per annum on $8,630.16, $510.72 pursuant to California Civil Code Section 3289(b),from the time of the breach on February 15, 2011 to September 1, 2011, the date of the Order confirming the Arbitration Award TOT AL TO CYNTHIA NORWOOD $9,140.883. Lost benefits for the 462 hours of lost time $3,229.38 between February 15, 2011 to May 13, 2011 at the rate of $6.99 per hour 4. Interest of ten (10) percent per annum on $3,229.38, $191.11 pursuant to California Civil Code Section 3289(b), from the time of the breach on February 15, 2011to September 1, 2011, the date of the Order confirming the Arbitration AwardTOTAL TO THE CARPENTERS SOUTHWEST $3,420.49 ADMINISTRATIVE CORPORATIONGRAND TOTAL $12,561.37 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ir)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust v. Darracq Concrete
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust
Represented By: Yuliya S Mirzoyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Darracq Concrete
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?