Rina S Boivin v. City of Santa Maria et al
Plaintiff: Rina S Boivin
Defendant: City of Santa Maria, City of Santa Maria Police Department, Does and Officer Nathan Totorica
Case Number: 2:2011cv06620
Filed: August 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 16 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ca)
December 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh: On August 11, 2011, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants the City of Santa Maria, the Santa Maria Police Department, and Officer Nathan Totorica, alleging that Officer Totorica used excessive force against her when he fired a taser gun at her and that the City and the police department are liable for the Totorica's use of excessive force. (Complaint at 6.) Plaint iff had 120 days, until December 9, 2011, to serve Defendants with the Summons and Complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). She has not filed a proof of service showing that she has done so nor has she requested an extension of time to do so. Plaintiff has until January 15, 2012 to either serve Defendants and file the proofs of service or provide the Court with good cause as to why she has not been able to do so. Absent a showing of good cause, the Court will not grant Plaintiff any additional time to serve Defendants and will instead dismiss the case. **PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS** Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/15/2012. (ca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rina S Boivin v. City of Santa Maria et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rina S Boivin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Santa Maria
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Santa Maria Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Nathan Totorica
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?