Geneieve Burgess et al v. Pretty Dangerous Films LLC et al
| Genevieve Burgess, Christopher Didiot, Todd Frambach, Mark Harbacheck, Jonathan Hiers, Daniel W Jones, Erinn Knight, Joseph Litsch, Robert Lee Martin, Georgeanne Olive, Linda Robinson, Heather Sease and George Spence |
| Ryan Johnson, Mississippi Wild Productions LLC and Pretty Dangerous Films LLC |
| 2:2011cv06837 |
| August 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution by Judge Manuel L. Real. This matter is set on calendar for hearing on May 21, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., for an Order to Show Cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure of plaintiff to file a proper proofs of service of summons and complaint on remaining defendant Pretty Dangerous Films LLC. Presence of counsel at the hearing is mandatory; failure to attend will result in dismissal of the action.(jre)
|
|
Filing
13
JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS MISSISSIPPI WILD PRODUCTIONS, LLC, AND RYAN JOHNSON by Judge Manuel L. Real,JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants Mississippi Wild Productions, LLC, and Ryan Johnson in the amount of One Hundred Thousand and no/100 dollars ($100,000.00) plus costs. (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
