Steven Cisneros v. McEwen
Petitioner: Steven Cisneros
Respondent: McEwen
Case Number: 2:2011cv07021
Filed: August 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Related to: MOTION for Order for in Response to Superior Court's Denial of Habeas Corpus 1 , R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 5 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steven Cisneros v. McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Cisneros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?