Peter Joseph Cavanagh v. County of Ventura et al
| Peter Joseph Cavanagh |
| Rosemary Shorr, Greg Abille, Donna Angel, Martin Bolger, Reynaldo Caudillo, City of Oxnard, Bruce Clark, James Cloninger, Tari Cody, Tari Cory, County of Ventura, Does, Linda Groberg, Patricia Gutierrez, Pam Harris, Mike L'Clure, Patricia Murphy, Vincent O'Neill, Rebecca Riley, Robert F Sandbach, Doe Whitney, Ventura County Probation Agency, Mark Varela, Ventura County District Attorney's Office and Gregory Totten |
| 2:2011cv07112 |
| August 29, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block: On or before June 29, 2012, plaintiff is ordered to either file a Second Amended Complaint in compliance with the District Judges May 4, 2012 Order or show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order and/or failure to prosecute. (rla)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Manuel L. Real for Report and Recommendation 11 : IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 1. The following claims are dismissed without leave to amend: (a) plaintiffs damag es claims against the Ventura County District Attorney's Office and the district attorney defendants being sued in their official capacities, the "Ventura County Probation Agency' and the probation officers being sued in their official capacities, the Ventura County Superior Court and the judges being sued in their official capacities, and the EDD and the EDDofficials being sued in their official capacities; (b) plaintiff's claims against the six judicial officer defendants i n their individual capacities; (c) plaintiffs claims against the two District Attorney defendants in their individual capacities; (d) plaintiffs claims against the three EDD defendants in their individual capacities; and (e) plaintiffs claims against the three Probation Agency defendants in their individual capacities; 2. The following claims are dismissed with leave to amend:(See document for further details.) (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
