Janice Tria v. Innovation Ventures LLC et al
Does and Janice Tria |
Innovation Ventures LLC and Does |
2:2011cv07135 |
August 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patrick J. Walsh |
George H Wu |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 199 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re MOTION to Dismiss Case 198 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Trias motion for dismissal of the entire action with prejudice is GRANTED, subject to the terms of the parties settlement agreement. The Honorable George H. Wu retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties settlement agreement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pj) |
Filing 75 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Defendant Innovative Venture, LLC's Requests for Reconsideration/Clarification of Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Compel Production of Engagement Letter (Docket No. 72 ) by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. In response to the Court's request, Defendant has filed a reply brief addressing various discovery issues. After reconsidering its finding that the engagement letter is not relevant and, therefore, not discoverable, the Court reaffirms that ruling. (See Minute Order for further details) (afe) |
Filing 35 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh GRANTING Stipulation for Protective Order, 32 . (ca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.