Mophie Inc v. Ronald Reeves et al
Plaintiff: Mophie Inc
Defendant: Ronald Reeves and Does
Case Number: 2:2011cv07328
Filed: September 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Suzanne H. Segal
Presiding Judge: Stephen V. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re 14 Stipulation to Dismiss Party by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Having considered the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant RONALD REEVES ("REEVES") pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro cedure, the Court hereby orders that this action be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, as to Defendant RONALD REEVES with each party to bear its/his own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED and DECREED. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (kti)
January 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Court, having received the plaintiffs response re OSC on January 23, 2012 10 , hereby VACATES the Order to Show Cause iss ued on January 9, 2012 9 . Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than February 22, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (kti)
January 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than January 23, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (kti)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mophie Inc v. Ronald Reeves et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mophie Inc
Represented By: Marcus F Chaney
Represented By: Christopher Dain Johnson
Represented By: Christopher Q Pham
Represented By: Jason Robert Vener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?