Jamar Roy Lee Rogers v. Virga
Petitioner: Jamar Roy Lee Rogers
Respondent: Mr Virga
Case Number: 2:2011cv07666
Filed: September 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R. Gary Klausner
Presiding Judge: Ralph Zarefsky
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Petition is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Re: Order Accepting Report and Recommendations 17 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ib)
September 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky: Response to Order to Show Cause due by no later than 21 days from the filing date of this order. (ib)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jamar Roy Lee Rogers v. Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mr Virga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jamar Roy Lee Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?