Margarito Zavalza v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
| Margarito Zavalza |
| HSBC Bank USA NA, Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank NA, Does and First American Loan Star Trustee Services LLC |
| 2:2011cv08163 |
| September 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed defense counsels declaration filed on December 12, 2011, Chaffin Decl., Dkt. 11, and the attached Request for Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff in the Supe rior Court for the County of Los Angeles on November 22, 2011, Dkt. 11-1. Defendants request dismissal of this matter in light of Plaintiffs filing of said request in the Superior Court. However, this case was removed from the Superior Court on Septe mber 30, 2011; thus, the request for dismissal was improperly filed. Nonetheless, although the Court recognizes that the filing of a request for dismissal in the Superior Court does not effectuate dismissal in this Court, Plaintiff has informed the Court that she does not object to dismissal here. Accordingly, the Court dismisses each of Plaintiffs causes of action without prejudice., Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
