Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC v. Webcamnow.com Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC v. Webcamnow.com Inc

Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC v. Webcamnow.com Inc

Plaintiff:	Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC
Defendant:	Webcamnow.com Inc
Case Number:	2:2011cv08257
Filed:	October 4, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	S. James Otero
Presiding Judge:	Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit:	Patent

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 18, 2013	Filing 44 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. Court orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than JUNE 25, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed as to al l remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligent ly. Proof of service of the Summons and Complaint on defendant GSMC, Inc. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will standsubmitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. (rla)
January 24, 2012	Filing 16 (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THESE CASES SHOULD NOT BE COMBINED by Judge David O. Carter: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why these five cases should not be combined into one. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order of no mor e than 10 pages on or before January 30, 2012. Failure to file a response to this Order shall be deemed consent to consolidating these cases. If any of the Defendants in these five actions Webcamnow.com, Game Link LLC, GSMC, Inc., Ahava, Inc., and Fo rd Motor Co. wishes to file a response to this Order or a reply to Plaintiff's response, they must do so in a brief of no more than 4 pages on or before February 6,2012. Failure to file shall be deemed consent to consolidating these cases. If a ny of the parties in any of these five cases files a brief opposing consolidation, then all parties in all five cases shall appear before this Court on February 9, 2012, at 5:30 p.m. If no party files a brief opposing consolidation by the deadlines imposed herein, then this Court ORDERS that, on February 10, 2012: (See document for details.) (rla)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 18, 2013

Filing 44 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. Court orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than JUNE 25, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed as to al l remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligent ly. Proof of service of the Summons and Complaint on defendant GSMC, Inc. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will standsubmitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. (rla)

January 24, 2012

Filing 16 (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THESE CASES SHOULD NOT BE COMBINED by Judge David O. Carter: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why these five cases should not be combined into one. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order of no mor e than 10 pages on or before January 30, 2012. Failure to file a response to this Order shall be deemed consent to consolidating these cases. If any of the Defendants in these five actions Webcamnow.com, Game Link LLC, GSMC, Inc., Ahava, Inc., and Fo rd Motor Co. wishes to file a response to this Order or a reply to Plaintiff's response, they must do so in a brief of no more than 4 pages on or before February 6,2012. Failure to file shall be deemed consent to consolidating these cases. If a ny of the parties in any of these five cases files a brief opposing consolidation, then all parties in all five cases shall appear before this Court on February 9, 2012, at 5:30 p.m. If no party files a brief opposing consolidation by the deadlines imposed herein, then this Court ORDERS that, on February 10, 2012: (See document for details.) (rla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC v. Webcamnow.com Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Webcamnow.com Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC
Represented By:	Steven W Ritcheson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?