Raul R Gallardo v. Arthur Patino et al
| Raul R Gallardo |
| Arthur Patino, Frank Dominguez and Arnold Castro, Sr |
| 2:2011cv08576 |
| October 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Otis D Wright |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 dismissal) (lc) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Raul R Gallardo. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Cervantes, Lisa) |
Filing 20
ORDER granting Stipulation #19 to Extend defendants Arnold Castro, Frank Dominguez and Arthur Patino time to answer amended complaint to 1/9/2012 by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 19 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 1/9/2012 filed by Defendants Arthur Patino. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Glicksman, Jason) |
|
Filing 18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Order Finding as Moot Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Case #12 (Filed 10/28/11) by Judge Otis D Wright II. On November 21, 2011, Plaintiff, Raul R. Gallardo, filed a First Amended Complaint, which was timely under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). #17 Thus, the original Complaint is no longer operative and Defendants Motion is deemed moot. (sch)
|
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Arnold Castro, Sr, Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino amending complaint within Notice of Removal, #1 Jury demand filed by plaintiff Raul R Gallardo (lc) (lc). |
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Amended Document (Non-Motion), #14 , for the following reasons: A DETAILED explanation was sent on November 18, 2011. Read it and comply. RE Notice of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112) re initiating documents #15 . (lc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Document (Non-Motion), #14 pdf is an initiating document, the First Amended Complaint. The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event and incorrect procedure selected.Per G.O. 10-07, Attorneys are NOT TO E-FILE INITIATING DOCUMENTS*, but to MANUALLY FILE IT WITH CIVIL INTAKE In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff Raul R Gallardo. PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR: (1)Trademark Infringement; Unfair Competition; False Designation of Origin and False Description [Lanham Act 43(a), 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)] (2) Dilution [Lanham Act 43(c), 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)] (3) Trademark Infringement [Common Law] (4) Dilution and Deceptive Trade Practices [Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 14330 and Common Law] (5) Unfair Competition [Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200] (6) Misappropriation; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (Cervantes, Lisa) Modified on 11/21/2011 (lc).(STRICKEN PER 11/21/11 ORDER) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's Complaints #12 filed by Defendants Arnold Castro, Sr, Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Glicksman, Jason) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's Complaints filed by Defendants Arnold Castro, Sr, Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino. Motion set for hearing on 11/28/2011 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Glicksman, Jason) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 11-06416 ODW (SSx). Case transferred from Judge Manuel L. Real to Judge Otis D Wright, II for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 11-08576 ODW(SSx).Signed by Judge Otis D Wright, II (rn)
|
| Filing 11 MINUTE OF (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER Re Case Reassigned to Judge Wright. This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Otis D. Wright II, United States DistrictJudge. The magistrate judges assignment remains the same. Please substitute the initials ODW in place of the initials R. The case number will now read: CV 11-08576- ODW(SSx). Henceforth, it is imperative that the initials ODW be used on all documents to prevent delays in the processing of documents. (sch) |
|
Filing 10
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (sch)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D Wright II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filling the motion. The Court hears motions on Mondays, Criminal at 10:00 a.m. and Civil at 1:30 p.m. The Court requires delivery of one non-blue backed Mandatory Chambers Copies of only the following manual and electronically filed documents: (1) All noticed motion and related documents; (2) All ex parte applications and related documents; and (3) All exhibits and attachments must be separately tabbed. [Refer to the Courts General Order No. 10-07 regarding ECF Courtesy paper Copies.] (sch)
|
| Filing 7 DECLARATION of Jason W. Glicksman of filing Notice of Removal in State Court filed by Defendants Arnold Castro, Sr, Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino. (Glicksman, Jason) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Arnold Castro, Sr, Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino. (Glicksman, Jason) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (Attachments: #1 AO-120) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendants Arnold Castro, Sr, Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino, re Notice of Related Case(s) #3 , Notice of Removal, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 served on 10/17/11. (ghap) (mg). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendants Arnold Castro, Sr, Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino. Related Case(s): CV 11-6416-ODW (SSX). (ghap) (mg). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Arnold Castro, Sr, Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino. (ghap) (mg). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, case number BC468501 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Manuel L. Real, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (Filing fee $ 350:PAID), filed by defendants Frank Dominguez, Arthur Patino, Arnold Castro, Sr.(ghap) (mg). |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raul R Gallardo, upon Defendant Frank Dominguez served on 9/13/2011, answer due 10/4/2011. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Arthur Patino, Person in Charge, Male,Hispanic, 55-60 Years Old, 6 Feet, 220 Pounds, Brown-Gray Hair in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/29/11 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raul R Gallardo, upon Defendant Arthur Patino served on 9/13/2011, answer due 10/4/2011. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive service of process for the party in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/29/11 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
