Denise Valencia v. Vandenberg Chase and Associates LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Denise Valencia v. Vandenberg Chase and Associates LLC

Denise Valencia v. Vandenberg Chase and Associates LLC

Plaintiff:	Denise Valencia
Defendant:	Vandenberg Chase and Associates LLC
Case Number:	2:2011cv08719
Filed:	October 21, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Oswald Parada
Presiding Judge:	George H Wu
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 24, 2012	Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge George H Wu. On April 18, 2012, an Order to Show Cause for Lack of Prosecution 11 was issued for the following reason: Plaintiff has not diligently prosecuted this action. Plaintiff was given until May 22, 2012 to respond and no response or objection has been filed. Plaintiff is hereby notified that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (kti)
April 18, 2012	Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge George H Wu: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motio n, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than May 22, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 24, 2012

Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge George H Wu. On April 18, 2012, an Order to Show Cause for Lack of Prosecution 11 was issued for the following reason: Plaintiff has not diligently prosecuted this action. Plaintiff was given until May 22, 2012 to respond and no response or objection has been filed. Plaintiff is hereby notified that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (kti)

April 18, 2012

Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge George H Wu: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motio n, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than May 22, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denise Valencia v. Vandenberg Chase and Associates LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Vandenberg Chase and Associates LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Valencia
Represented By:	Nicholas J Bontrager
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?