Printograph Inc v. Angelina Hernandez et al
Printograph Inc |
Angelina Hernandez and Does 1-10 |
2:2011cv08766 |
October 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Suzanne H Segal |
Otis D Wright |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 NOTICE of Entry of Entry of Judgment and Permanent Injunction, re: Permanent Injunction, #19 , filed by Plaintiff Printograph Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Morseburg, Douglas) |
Filing 19 JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION entered in favor of plaintiff Printograph, Inc. and against against defendant Angelina Hernandez and her agents. The parties shall bear their own fees and cost by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Printograph Incto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines,,,,,, #17 to Order to Show Cause (D.N. 17) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Morseburg, Douglas) |
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II:Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than June 4, 2011 why this action should notbe dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:Plaintiff's filing a proposed judgment or a noticed motion for entry of default judgment. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court'sOrder may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Ruling, re: Order on Motion for Default Judgment, #15 , filed by Plaintiff Printograph Inc. (Morseburg, Douglas) |
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment #11 is GRANTED as to liability and injunctive relief. Further, Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorneys fees. (ir) |
Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Hearing on MOTION for DefaultJudgment #11 , scheduled for January 23, 2012 at 1:30 p.m., is herebyVACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. (lc) |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of Sonik Artounian In Support of Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Court MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant, an individual Hernandez, Angelina #11 filed by Plaintiff Printograph Inc. (Morseburg, Douglas) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Douglas H. Morseburg In Support of Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Court MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant, an individual Hernandez, Angelina #11 filed by Plaintiff Printograph Inc. (Morseburg, Douglas) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant, an individual Hernandez, Angelina filed by Plaintiff Printograph, Inc. Printograph Inc. Motion set for hearing on 1/23/2012 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Default Judgment and Permanent Injuction)(Morseburg, Douglas) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than December 22, 2011 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's filing of a noticed motion for entry of default judgment.In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc) |
Filing 9 DEFAULT BY CLERK ENTERED as to *Defendant Angelina Hernandez* (sch) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Angelina Hernandez #7 . The following error(s) was found: Pdf document is only for default. Erroneous event relief was selected. The correct event is: Request: Clerk to enter default. Clerk will process default by Separate entry this time only. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 7 APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Angelina Hernandez filed by Plaintiff Printograph Inc. (Morseburg, Douglas) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than December 5, 2011 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:Answer by the defendant(s) or plaintiff's request for entry of default.In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Printograph Inc, upon Defendant Angelina Hernandez served on 10/26/2011, answer due 11/16/2011. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Angelina Hernandez in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (Morseburg, Douglas) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D Wright II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filling the motion. The Court hears motions on Mondays, Criminal at 10:00 a.m. and Civil at 1:30 p.m. The Court requires delivery of one non-blue backed Mandatory Chambers Copies of only the following manual and electronically filed documents: (1) All noticed motion and related documents; (2) All ex parte applications and related documents; and (3) All exhibits and attachments must be separately tabbed. [Refer to the Courts General Order No. 10-07 regarding ECF Courtesy paper Copies.] (sch) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PROGRAM filed.(ghap) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Printograph Inc. (ghap) (mg). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Angelina Hernandez. Case assigned to Judge Otis D Wright, II for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal.(Filing fee $ 350:PAID) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Printograph Inc.(ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2011: #1 Ntc of Asgmt) (mg). |
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Angelina Hernandez. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.