Earlie Elks Sr v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc et al
| Earlie Elks, Sr |
| Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals LLC, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc, Takeda San Diego Inc, Takeda Global Research and Development Center Inc and Does |
| 2:2011cv08932 |
| October 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be transferred to the Unit ed States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina for the convenience of the parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice. Plaintiffs shall file a response to this Order, in writing, no later than 11/23/2011. Plaintiffs are ordered to personally serve a copy of this Order on any defendant that has already been served with the Complaint within three court days of the date of this Order or at the time of service for any defendant that has not already been served. Failure to timely respond to this Order may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. See document for details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
