Gabriel Enriquez v. Michael Martel
Petitioner: Gabriel Enriquez
Respondent: Michael Martel
Case Number: 2:2011cv09063
Filed: November 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
Presiding Judge: George H. King
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge George H. King, Petitioner was required to obtain authorization from the Court of Appeals before filing the present Petition. It appears that no such authorization has been obtained in this case. Thus, the Petition should be dismissed for that reason. re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gabriel Enriquez v. Michael Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gabriel Enriquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?