Erik R Carbajal v. R Rayborn et al
| Erik R Carbajal |
| Does and R Rayborn |
| 2:2011cv09134 |
| November 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 51 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 7/18/2013 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
71
JUDGMENT 51 70 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: For the reasons discussed in the Court's Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 70 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Erik R. Carbajal takes nothing; 2. Judgment for Defendant R. Raborn; 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jre)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On January 8, 2013, the parties reported that they have scheduled a settlement conference for February 26, 2013, before Judge Victor Bianchini. The Court herebyORDERS the parties to jointly file a brief statement concerning the settlementdiscussions, indicating whether the matter has settled. This statement must be filed by March 11, 2013. (lc)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Otis D Wright, II: The parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the attorneys in this caseMervyn S. Lazarus and Andrew M. Gibsonshould not be sanctioned $1,000 for ignoring the Courts ord er. A written, joint response is due by January 14, 2013. No appearances are necessary. Failure to timely respond may result in additional sanctions, including dismissal or entry of default. This Order to Show Cause will be discharged upon receipt of a status report indicating that asettlement conference has been scheduled. The parties may use outside ADR instead of the magistrate judge if they choose. The Court will not rule on the pending Summary-Judgment motion until the settlement conference has been conducted. (lc)
|
|
Filing
12
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge David T Bristow (See document for further information) (am)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
