J and J Sports Productions Inc v. Elaine Ann Cheveras et al
J and J Sports Productions Inc |
Elaine Ann Cheveras and Jeffery Louis Roedl |
2:2011cv09397 |
November 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
William D. Keller |
Fernando M. Olguin |
Cable/Satellite TV |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK: Judgment in favor of Plaintiff, J&J Sports Productions, Inc and against Defendant, Elaine Ann Cheveras, individually d/b/a Laineys Gar and Brill; Jeffrey Louis Roedl, individually d/b/a Laineys Gar and Brill, entered on December 18, 2012, be and the same is hereby renewed in the amounts as set forth below: Renewal of money judgment. a. Total judgment........ $4,001.00. b. Costs after judgment........ $0.00. c. Subtotal (add a and b)........ $4,00 1.00. d. Credits........ $0.00. e. Subtotal (subtract d from c)........ $4,001.00. f. Interest after judgment(.15%)........ $59.42. g. Fee for filing renewal of application........ $0.00. h. Total renewed judgment (add e, f and g)........ $4,060.42. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Judgment, 14 , 27 . (shb) |
Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Judge William D. Keller, in favor of J and J Sports Productions Inc against Elaine Ann Cheveras, Jeffery Louis Roedl Related to: Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment 12 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.