Loretta Khachatryan v. Equable Ascent Financial LLC
Plaintiff: Loretta Khachatryan
Defendant: Equable Ascent Financial LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv09523
Filed: November 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
Presiding Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Otis D Wright, II. THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with the orders of the Court. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rrey)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loretta Khachatryan v. Equable Ascent Financial LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Loretta Khachatryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equable Ascent Financial LLC
Represented By: Lindsey A Morgan
Represented By: Jeffrey A Topor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?