Jorge Salcedo v. County of Los Angeles
Jorge Salcedo |
County of Los Angeles |
2:2011cv09775 |
November 23, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Frederick F. Mumm |
Christina A. Snyder |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (See attached order for details.) (es) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jorge Salcedo v. County of Los Angeles | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: County of Los Angeles | |
Represented By: | Lauren Dana Thibodeaux |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jorge Salcedo | |
Represented By: | Alexander E Papaefthimiou |
Represented By: | Megan A Richmond |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.