Designing Health Inc. v. Udo Erasmus
Designing Health Inc. |
Udo Erasmus |
2:2011cv09952 |
December 1, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Audrey B. Collins |
Victor B. Kenton |
Other Statutory Actions |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Pursuant to the stipulation submitted by Defendant Udo Erasmus reflecting that theJudgment in his favor has been fully satisfied, the Court hereby dismisses this matter. (ab) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Designing Health Inc. v. Udo Erasmus | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Designing Health Inc. | |
Represented By: | Gregory M Salvato |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Udo Erasmus | |
Represented By: | Max Craig Cassing |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.