Designing Health Inc. v. Udo Erasmus
Plaintiff: Designing Health Inc.
Defendant: Udo Erasmus
Case Number: 2:2011cv09952
Filed: December 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Audrey B. Collins
Presiding Judge: Victor B. Kenton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Pursuant to the stipulation submitted by Defendant Udo Erasmus reflecting that theJudgment in his favor has been fully satisfied, the Court hereby dismisses this matter. (ab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Designing Health Inc. v. Udo Erasmus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Designing Health Inc.
Represented By: Gregory M Salvato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Udo Erasmus
Represented By: Max Craig Cassing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?