Mavrix Photo Inc v. Idontlikeyouinthatway.com et al
| Mavrix Photo Inc |
| Idontlikeyouinthatway.com, Craveonline Media LLC, Atomiconline LLC and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 2:2011cv10035 |
| December 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| George H King |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (ir) |
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge George H. King, re Stipulation #25 . Plaintiff's First Amended complaint filed 5/7/11 and all claims thereto shall be dismissed with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (ir)
|
| Filing 25 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Mavrix Photo Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vakil, Imran) |
| Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Mavrix Photo Inc, re First Amended Complaint #23 , Parties Stipulation for filing of First Amended complaint, Notice of Lodging and Proposed Order granting leave to file a First Amended complaint served on 4/30/12. (ir) |
| Filing 23 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Atomiconline LLC, Craveonline Media LLC, Does, Idontlikeyouinthatway.com amending Complaint #1 , filed by plaintiff Mavrix Photo Inc. (bm) (ir). |
|
Filing 22
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR FILING First Amended Complaint For Copyright Infringement by Judge George H. King, re Stipulation to Amend/Correct #18 : NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. Pursuant to the stipulation filed by the parties filed on April 26, 2012, the Court approves the filing of a First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Mavrix Photo, Inc. Said First Amended Complaint shall be filed as a stand-alone document within five (5) days hereof. Defendants shall respond to the FAC within thirty (30) days hereof. (bm)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Stipulation to Amend/Correct #18 , Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B), Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) #20 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re: Stipulation for Filing First Amended Complaint, #2 Proof of Service)(Vakil, Imran) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS - ORDER by Clerk of Court by Beatrice Herrera, Clerk to Judge King: DOCUMENT #18 ACCEPTED, SUBJECT TO THE PLAINTIFF FILING A "NOTICE OF LODGING" PROPOSED ORDER BY NO LATER THAN MONDAY, APRIL 30, 2012. RE: Stipulation to Amend Complaint #18 (lw) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Amend the complaint #18 . The following error(s) was found: No Proposed Order submitted. No proof of service attached. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lw) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mavrix Photo Inc. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint with Exhibits 1 and 2)(Vakil, Imran) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Abrams for settlement. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) confer with each other and set a date and time for a settlement conference, after clearing the date with Magistrate Judge Abrams' clerk, Christianna Howard, (213) 894-7103. The date selected must be soon enough to comply with any deadlines imposed by the District Judge, but not before the parties have engaged in sufficient discussions to make a settlement conference meaningful. In general, the parties should contact the court clerk at least 30 days prior to the date on which they wish to hold the settlement conference. Please note that settlement conferences are usually conducted on Thursdays and begin at 9:00 a.m. (ch)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge George H. King: A deadline for dispositive motions has been set in the above-captioned case. Any motion(s) for summary judgment SHALL comply with all Federal and Local Rules, as well as this Order. Please be advised that this Order contains requirements more specific than the Local and Federal Rules. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER ENTERING SCHEDULING DATES by Judge George H. King: We have considered the Joint Scheduling Conference Report Pursuant to Rule 26(f), and now enter the following scheduling order: 1. Any stipulation or motion to amend as to any claims, defenses and/or parties shall be lodged/filed by no later than May 4, 2012, failing which it shall be deemed that party's waiver of any such amendments in this action. 2. All discovery (fact and expert) shall be COMPLETED by no later than October 4, 2012. Completion means that any discovery that is not received in hand by the requesting party by the completion date will be denied. If any discovery motions are necessary, the parties shall ensure that they are calendared and heard by the magistrate judge sufficiently in advance of the completion date to permit actual production, by the completion date, of any discovery the judge might order. 3. The parties shall designate their expert witnesses, and make the required disclosures, by no later than August 20, 2012, and do likewise for any rebuttal expert witnesses by no later than September 10, 2012. 4. The parties shall comply with Local Rule 16-15 as follows: a) First, this case may benefit for early settlement discussions. Accordingly, we order the parties to contact the court clerk to Judge Paul L. Abrams to set a time for an early settlement conference within 60 days hereof. Within 14 days hereof, counsel shall file a joint status report with the court setting forth the date set for the early settlement conference. If the case settles, counsel shall notify the court clerk forthwith. If the case does not settle, counsel shall file a joint status report with the court within 48 hours of termination of settlement discussions; b) If the case is not resolved at the early settlement conference, the parties shall conduct a followup settlement conference by no later than October 19, 2012. Thereafter, counsel shall file a joint status report with the court within 48 hours of conclusion of the settlement conference to advise the court of the result of such settlement conference. 5. No motion for summary judgment may be filed without a joint certification by counsel that they have complied in good faith with Local Rule 16-15 as set forth above. Any motion for summary judgment shall be filed in compliance with the Local Rules, as well as our Order Re: Summary Judgment Motions issued concurrently herewith, by no later than November 26, 2012, and noticed for hearing thereafter regularly under the Local Rules. Any untimely or non-conforming motion will be denied. Any motion for summary judgment that is filed without a certification of compliance with Local Rule 16-15 as set forth above will be stricken and denied. 6. The court will set pre-trial conference and trial dates, if necessary, after resolution of the summary judgment motion(s), if any. 7. Failure by any party and/or counsel to strictly comply with the Federal and Local Rules, as well as our Orders, will result in the imposition of an appropriate sanction against the offending party/counsel. (bm)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE: (In Chambers) Taking Off Calendar Scheduling Conference: On the Courts own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for March 26, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. is hereby TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. The Court will issue such orders as deemed appropriate. No appearance by counsel is necessary IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge George H. King. (ir)
|
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Plaintiff Mavrix Photo Inc.. (Vakil, Imran) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED #11 PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams **See Order for details. / NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT** (Attachments: #1 Stipulated Protective Order Re Confidential Information) (ch)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendants Atomiconline LLC, Craveonline Media LLC, Idontlikeyouinthatway.com. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pink, Jonathan) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER of Deficiencies in Electronically filed documents: The document is accepted as filed. Court notes that Notice of Interested Parties has been filed on 1/25/12 RE: Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #6 (ir) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. King: THIS MATTER IS SET FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON: MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2012 AT 1:30 P.M., at the Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 E. Temple Street, Suite 650, Los Angeles, California. Counsel primarily responsible for the conduct of this litigation and who has the authority to enter into stipulations and to make admissions regarding all matters that the participants may reasonably anticipate may be discussed, or the party if unrepresented, SHALL ATTEND IN PERSON. By no later than FEBRUARY 27, 2012, counsel for all appearing parties and all unrepresented appearing parties, if any, shall meet, in person, and discuss the matters set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) as well as those items identified in Part III, below. By no later than MARCH 12, 2012, counsel for all appearing parties and all unrepresented appearing parties, if any, shall file a joint "REPORT OF PARTIES' PLANNING MEETING" which shall (1) be so labeled, (2) state the date of the Scheduling Conference set above by this Order, and (3) address not only those subjects in Rule 26(f), but also the following: (see document for further details). (bm)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Atomiconline LLC, Craveonline Media LLC, Idontlikeyouinthatway.com, (Pink, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer #6 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties and or no copies. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Atomiconline LLC, Craveonline Media LLC, Idontlikeyouinthatway.com.(Pink, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Imran Farooq Vakil counsel for Plaintiff Mavrix Photo Inc. Adding Imran F. Vakil as attorney as counsel of record for Mavrix Photo, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Mavrix Photo, Inc. (Vakil, Imran) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT by Judge George H. King, This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge George H. King. The court fully adheres to Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires that the Rules be "construed and administered to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding." Counsel shall also be guided by the following special requirements, some of which are more specific than those set out in the Local Rules. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) (lw)
|
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Mavrix Photo Inc. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mavrix Photo Inc. (et) (mg). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Atomiconline LLC, Craveonline Media LLC, Does 1-10 inclusive, Idontlikeyouinthatway.com. Case assigned to Judge George H. King for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams.(Filing fee $ 350 Paid.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Mavrix Photo Inc.(et) (mg). |
| 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendants Atomiconline LLC, Craveonline Media LLC, Idontlikeyouinthatway.com. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
