Gary Bernard Morgan v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Gary Bernard Morgan |
| Judge Sandoval, Officer Rubacala, Attorney Adrian Baca, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department and Perez |
| 2:2011cv10081 |
| December 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 15 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge David T Bristow. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint was due on or before January 13, 2012. Plaintiff has failed to file a First Amended Complaint within the allotted time nor has he requested an extension of ti me within which to do so. Accordingly, on or before February 27, 2012, plaintiff is ORDERED to either (a) advise the Court that he does not desire to pursue this action; (b) if plaintiff does desire to pursue this action, show good cause in writing, if any exists, why plaintiff has not timely filed with the Court his First Amended Complaint, and why the Court should not recommend that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts prior Order; or (c) serve and file a First Amended Complaint. (mrgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
