Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Mark E Taplin et al
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
| Toya Fuller and Mark E Taplin |
| 2:2011cv10120 |
| December 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| John E. McDermott |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT IN INTERPLEADER by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: MetLife, Kaiser Permanente, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Permanente Group Insurance Plan (the "Plan") shall each be discha rged with prejudice from all liability and obligations arising out of the death of decedent Gloria J. Fuller ("Decedent"), Decedent's participation in the Plan and/or Decedent's death benefits otherwise due under the Plan. Defenda nts Mark E. Taplin ("Taplin") and Toya Fuller ("Fuller"), and each of them, their agents, attorneys or assigns, shall be enjoined perpetually and restrained from instituting any suit at law or equity, or action of any kind whatsoe ver, against MetLife, Kaiser Permanente, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and/or the Plan with regard to death of Decedent, Decedent's participation in the Plan and/or Decedent's death benefits otherwise due under the Plan. The Clerk sh all continue to hold all sums placed in interpleader by MetLife in an interest bearing account pending further order of the Court. MetLife is dismissed from this action with prejudice. MetLife is released from any obligation to make any further court appearances or file further papers in this matter. (gk)
|
|
Filing
15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution. defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). The court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before May 3, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to Defendant Toya Fuller (Fuller). Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiffs response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint against Defendant Fuller. (im)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
