Patricia Lacy v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc et al
Patricia Lacy |
Does 1 through 10 inclusive, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc |
2:2011cv10183 |
December 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Dolly M Gee |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC472163, acknowledged on 4/20/2012. (gk) |
Filing 15 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff Patricia Lacy's Motion to Remand this Case to the Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC472163 #8 is GRANTED. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated. ) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (Attachments: #1 CV-103 Remand Transmittal Letter) (gk) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Ryan D Derry counsel for Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group. Ryan D. Derry will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice.Ryan D. Derry is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendant Kaiser Foundatoin Health; Kaiser Foundation Hospitals & SCPMG (Derry, Ryan) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dolly M. Gee #8 . The Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #8 , currently scheduled for hearing on February 3, 2012, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. This motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. (im) |
Notice of Electronic Filing re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, #13 e-mailed to ryanderry@dwt.com bounced due to recipient not found. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to the General Order and Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(tyw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 REPLY In Support of Motion MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #8 filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lacy. (Mathews, Charles) |
Filing 11 of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lacy, (Mathews, Charles) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Motion and Motion to Remand Action to State Court filed 1/6/2012 #8 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 9 OPPOSITION Opposition to re: MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #8 DECLARATION of Ryan D. Derry with Exhibits A - D filed by Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group. (Derry, Ryan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by plaintiff Patricia Lacy. Motion set for hearing on 2/3/2012 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Remand To State Court)(Mathews, Charles) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Clerk's Office Services for Attorneys, Notice to Counsel, Civility & Professional Guidelines, Notice of Assignment and Notice to Parties of ADR Program served on 12/09/11. (Derry, Ryan) |
Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Counsel for Plaintiffs shall serve this order immediately on all parties and/or their counsel, including any new parties to the action. If this case was removed from state court, defendant who removed the case shall serve this order on all other parties. See document for details. (smom) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Disclosure Statement #3 , Notice of Removal, #1 served on 12/8/2011. (et) (mg). |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group. (et) (mg). |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group. (et) (mg). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the CA for the County of Los Angeles, case number BC472163 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Charles F Eick. (Filing fee $ 350 Paid. ), filed by Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group. (et) (mg). |
CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Lacy, upon Defendant Kaiser Foundation Hospitals served on 11/8/2011, answer due 11/29/2011. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becy DeGeorge, Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. [Filed in State Court on 11/18/2011 Submitted Attached to Notice of Removal.] (et) |
CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Lacy, upon Defendant Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc served on 11/8/2011, answer due 11/29/2011. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becy DeGeorge, Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. [Filed in State Court on 11/18/2011 Submitted attached to notice of removal.] (et) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint #1 filed by Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group. [Filed in State Court on 12/7/2011 Submitted Attached to Notice of Removal.] (et) |
CONFOREMD COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group. [Filed in State Court on 12/7/2011 Submitted Attached to Notice of Removal.] (et) |
CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Southern California Permanente Medical Group amending Notice of Removal, #1 ,filed by Plaintiff Patricia Lacy. [Filed in State Court on 11/29/2011 Submitted attached to Notice of Removal.] (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.