Norman Edward Roque v. B M Cash
Petitioner: Norman Edward Roque
Respondent: B M Cash
Case Number: 2:2011cv10442
Filed: December 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER CLOSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Case should have been closed on entry dated May 30, 2014 56 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mu)
May 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 56 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS ADJUDGED that that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 18 . (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norman Edward Roque v. B M Cash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: B M Cash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Norman Edward Roque
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?