Cathay Entertainment Inc v. The City of Industry
Plaintiff: Cathay Entertainment Inc
Defendant: City of Industry
Case Number: 2:2011cv10686
Filed: December 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: A. Howard Matz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge A. Howard Matz, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 56 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kbr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cathay Entertainment Inc v. The City of Industry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathay Entertainment Inc
Represented By: A Dale Manicom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Industry
Represented By: Amy E Hoyt
Represented By: Stephen A McEwen
Represented By: Michele R Vadon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?