Richard H Perez v. Ray Mabus
Plaintiff: Richard H Perez
Defendant: Ray Mabus
Case Number: 2:2011cv10771
Filed: December 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Ralph Zarefsky
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson: Pursuant to the Court's 7/25/2013 Order 144 , and the Receipt in Full Satisfaction of Settlement filed on 9/17/2013 146 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs of suit and fees. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard H Perez v. Ray Mabus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard H Perez
Represented By: William W Bloch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Mabus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?