Richard H Perez v. Ray Mabus
Richard H Perez |
Ray Mabus |
2:2011cv10771 |
December 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Ralph Zarefsky |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 147 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson: Pursuant to the Court's 7/25/2013 Order 144 , and the Receipt in Full Satisfaction of Settlement filed on 9/17/2013 146 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs of suit and fees. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Richard H Perez v. Ray Mabus | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Richard H Perez | |
Represented By: | William W Bloch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ray Mabus | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.